Quantum Linguodynamics was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Article already deleted.
I reckon this is original research. At best it is speculative and lacks encyclopedic content, and has no Google hits. Delete as unfounded, despite the battery of external links. Charles Matthews 12:10, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Doubletalk, to see if we're on our toes. --Wetman 19:58, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete This is hideous and makes no sense. I also highly doubt it exists. The guy who made this needs to be contacted to see if he can make it better. --YixilTesiphon
- Hey, it's a brunch, isn't it? Sorry, I mean, since even linguodynamics is unknown to Google, it's some private joke at best. Delete -- Hoary 09:47, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Well, looks like it's gone. Good riddance. --YixilTesiphon
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.